Last week President Uhuru
Kenyatta went to the US to meet with Donald Trump. This was followed by
a trip to Kenya by British Prime Minister Theresa May, and this week
President Kenyatta will be attending the Forum on China Africa
Cooperation (FOCAC).
This flurry of diplomatic activity
spotlights the ongoing interest in Africa and Kenya by both the West
and East as well as a growing quest within the West for renewed
relevance in the continent.
Mr Kenyatta is the second
African leader to meet with Trump at the White House, following a visit
by Nigeria President Muhammadu Buhari earlier in the year.
Following
the meeting, investments worth $237 million were committed to wind
power and food security, signed with companies in Kenya and facilitated
by the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, a US government agency
that helps American businesses invest in emerging markets.
On
Thursday, Ms May and Mr Kenyatta held their bilateral meeting in
Nairobi, where Kenya was able to secure a deal to continue quota-free
exports of horticulture produce to Britain after it leaves the European
Union (EU).
They also reached agreements to co-operate on the anti-corruption drive and military training in Kenya.
From
her visit to South Africa on Tuesday, Ms May pledged £4 billion in
support for African economies, which is expected to be matched by the
private sector.
Her focus is on job creation for
African youth and she signalled an intent of British government to focus
more on long-term economic challenges rather than short-term poverty
reduction.
In her speech, the emerging rivalry for Africa within the West
itself emerged when May stated that she wanted the UK to overtake the US
and become the G7's biggest investor in Africa by 2022.
There are several points to note in the patterns emerging in the renewed push into Africa by the West.
First,
there seems to be a difference with US versus UK style in economic
deals. What is common, however, is the focus on private sector. The US
let private sector take front and centre in the deals announced so far.
The
Overseas Private Investment Corporation facilitated the process. The
role of the Kenyan government in all this is not clear yet. It seems
that the Kenyan private sector, not government, is the focus of US
interests.
In the case of the UK, there seems to be a blend of both public and private sector funding, with public engagement leading.
Again,
the extent to which deals will be signed directly with the Kenyan
government is not clear perhaps indicating that the UK is also more
focused on private sector engagement than on large programmes with
Nairobi.
The style of the US and UK contrasts starkly
with that of China. Sino-African deals are a government-to-government
affair with no clear articulation of how African private sector will
benefit from the engagements, or even link to the private sector in
China.
Interestingly, the focus on the private sector
and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) by the US and UK complements China’s
focus on debt and African governments.
This emerging complementarity can create a powerful blend of financing for the continent going forward.
It
will be interesting to see what key deals emerge from FOCAC this week
and whether China will begin to shift from being debt-focused, to FDI-
focused given concerns with rising Chinese debt in Africa.
No comments:
Post a Comment