Whenever we Africans reflect on how badly we have done over the
past 50 or so years of
Independence, it is not unusual for us to invoke the history of the so-called Asian Tigers and their transformation over the same period.
Independence, it is not unusual for us to invoke the history of the so-called Asian Tigers and their transformation over the same period.
For the most part, we invoke it to
make the important point that our leaders have been at best incompetent,
at worst uninterested in pursuing and achieving the kind of societal
transformation their Asian counterparts have. Sometimes even the very
leaders we seek to criticise engage in these kinds of reflections from
time to time.
We ordinary people can be forgiven for
lamenting and going on to do nothing to change the status quo. There is
little we can do to change it. We do not have the power to make the big
decisions needed for transformational change to happen. And we do not
have money.
Our leaders have both. It is therefore
obvious who should be doing something about this. There are, of course,
many reasons why they do little or nothing, but this is no time to go
into that.
These same reflections assaulted my mind
last week after I learnt of something happening in scattered locations
in rural Uganda.
South Korea’s bilateral development
agency, KOICA, working with local communities with some input from the
government of Uganda, is apparently causing something of a revolution in
some people’s lives. The inspiration for the “development initiative”
known as the Inclusive and Sustainable New Communities (ISNC) project is
Korea’s own Saemaul Undong or “New Village” Movement.
Also
known as the “New Community Movement” Saemaul Undong was a self-help
initiative that Korea’s most controversial president Park Chung-hee, the
architect of the country’s economic and social transformation, started.
His government used it as a tool to improve living
conditions in rural areas and help narrow the gap in income and welfare
with prosperous urban communities. That was as recently as the late
1960s and early 1970s.
In its first two decades, the
movement was managed in highly centralised fashion, which apparently
made it highly efficient in its delivery of rural infrastructure:
Irrigation systems, bridges, roads and modern housing.
Its
centrepiece was the direct involvement of communities in making things
happen, with the government providing mostly construction materials and
local people doing the rest, in a spirit of self-help underlain by
diligence and highly organised collective action.
The Koreans, God bless their souls, are now exporting Saemaul Undong to countries across Africa, Uganda being one.
Uganda’s
Inclusive and Sustainable New Communities project seeks to replicate
the success of Saemaul Undong. Communities here and there, thanks to
funding from KOICA, or inspired by the prospect of such funding, are
mobilising themselves to do such things as communal gardening, opening
up of local roads and cleaning up their own water sources.
Apparently,
outcomes include rehabilitated village infrastructure, improved living
conditions and improved household incomes deriving from small-scale
projects. At the individual household level, there are reports of
improved hygiene, sanitation, and increased food security. It has also
introduced “smart homes” built “almost completely using local materials”
and boasting sun drying racks for utensils and locally made eco-stoves.
Nothing new
Both
the beneficiaries and government officials are gushing in their praise
of what is going on in terms of championing local solutions to
locally-felt problems.
According to one beneficiary
quoted in a media report, “Before ISNC came we had a negative mind-set.
We did not know about farming co-operatives and improving banana
production and increasing value.” It all sounds rather novel; doesn’t
it? But what really is new in this approach?
As far as
I am concerned, the only thing that is new here is that Ugandans are
now being taught or inspired to learn the importance of self-help,
self-improvement and self-reliance by Koreans or outsiders.
There
is a time in our history, however, long before Park Chung-hee launched
Saemaul Undong, when we knew how to do these things and did not wait for
outsiders to teach us how to do them or give or promise us money to do
them.
We did them because we knew they were necessary,
and because doing them was a matter of common sense which had been
inculcated into us by leaders to whom leadership was about instilling
values and pursuing collective well-being.
In the kingdom of Buganda where this was most pronounced, their Saemaul Undong was called bulungi bwa nsi (for the common good).
The
British colonialists saw that it made a lot of sense and preserved it
and even exported it to other communities that did not have it. By the
time they left, 60 years or so later, it had become pretty much a
national institution.
And then we became independent
and aspired to become modern. In the process we abandoned even those
traditional things on which we could have built our own context-specific
modernity. Half a century after Independence, the inventors of Saemaul
Undong, a much younger movement than our own bulungi bwa nsi are teaching us the value of self-reliance.
Not
only that; they even have to give or promise us money before we do what
we used to do as a matter of common sense. And we think we have become
smarter since colonial rule ended.
Frederick Golooba-Mutebi is a Kampala- and Kigali-based researcher and writer on politics and public affairs. E-mail: fgmutebi@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment