Kenya’s corporate and political scenes have witnessed a lot of changes in leadership with varied reasons for the changes.
Some
of the exits in leadership are due to expiry of tenure. Others are due
to termination where shareholders feel that the leaders they put in
place do not have capacity to manage the organisation.
While
in some other cases, changes in leadership are caused by resignations
where the exiting leader does not desire to continue managing the
organisation for a varied number of reasons.
I will
cite the recent case where Independent Electoral and Boundaries
Commission Commissioner Roselyn Akombe resigned just days to the repeat
presidential election citing a number of reasons.
The
frequent exits of leaders and managers in businesses, political parties,
national institutions and even religious institutions, calls for proper
succession planning to avoid disruptions that may threaten the very
survival of the institutions. Often, institutions find themselves in a
period of uncertainty when a leader suddenly exits without a proper
succession plan in place.
Experts advice current
leaders to begin identifying and developing potential next generation
leaders who would take over in the event of an exit.
Some
call it mentorship, but succession planning is much more than
mentorship, it entails an intricate process of identifying a successor
or pool of successors and developing them in order to replace exiting
leaders at the right time.
It is really not about the new leaders carrying the mantle of
the exiting leaders, but rather about the new leaders carrying the
vision of the institution.
Therefore, a succession plan
must be based on the institution’s vision and strategic plan otherwise
it may disrupt the institution. In choosing a successor managers look at
several things in the potential successor, but what should be of prime
importance is ability to carry on the institution’s vision.
Succession
planning is important no matter the type of institution in question. It
is as necessary for the business sector as it is for political parties.
Political parties and leaders should have succession plans in place so that their vision is not lost. It is necessary in our national institutions.
Political parties and leaders should have succession plans in place so that their vision is not lost. It is necessary in our national institutions.
However,
succession planning for national institutions is more regulated as
various laws stipulate what should happen in the event of a vacancy.
Nevertheless, national institutions should have organisational succession plans to cater for certain vacancies and or exits in top management.
Nevertheless, national institutions should have organisational succession plans to cater for certain vacancies and or exits in top management.
Vital
national institutions should not be held at ransom just because of the
exit of one or a few members. Proper succession planning will ensure
that activities are not disrupted. Religious institutions can also have
succession planning.
This should be included in the their various laws so that succession politics is minimised.
The
institutions should begin by identifying successors and begin to train
them. It is also important to communicate to other members of the
organisation of the potential successor so as to avoid succession
politics.
Proper succession planning ensures that an
organisation’s activities continue undisrupted and minimises succession
politics guaranteeing survival and growth.
No comments:
Post a Comment