Kenyans should be worried about a slowdown in economic growth
this year as we head to the General Election, experts have warned.
This
is even as the government maintains it has put in place enough
contingencies to shield the country from the negative effects of
election politics.
With just seven months to the polls,
the cyclic effect that elections have on Kenya’s economy have begun to
show judging by the developments in 2016.
Job losses,
salary freezes, high cost of credit and increased adoption of technology
turned it into a year the business sector and Kenyans would like to
forget.
Paul Gachanja, the Chairman, Department of
Economic Theory at Kenyatta University (KU), says unless the government
figures out how to revitalise the stagnant agricultural sector in 2017,
it can only get worse because fewer jobs can be created in the current
environment.
“When we still depend on rain-fed
agriculture and export most of our products without any value addition,
then import the finished products, it tells you we are not serious about
a sector that employs a majority of the country’s population,” he says.
And
with an impending highly contested election and drought in parts of the
country, he says, it is going to be a rough ride singling out low
credit growth as one of the factors that could slow down the economy.
A
move by the government to regulate interest rates appears to have led
to a slowdown in credit growth as banks became “choosy” on who to give a
loan to which is denying businesses capital. Latest data from Central
Bank of Kenya (CBK) shows credit to the private sector grew 4.6 per cent
in October, the slowest pace since June 2008.
The government, however, maintains that it is on top of things and there is nothing to worry about.
“The
country’s growth is much higher than the average for the sub-Saharan
African region of 1.4 per cent and global growth of 3.1 per cent,”
Treasury Cabinet Secretary Henry Rotich told the Nation.
RESILIENT DOMESTIC DEMAND
“This
is supported by investments in infrastructural development, private
sector investments, resilient domestic demand, recovery in the tourism
sector and growth in exports to the region,” he said.
Different
economic growth projections had been made for 2016 but the World Bank’s
forecast of 5.9 per cent might be most accurate when the final results
are given by the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) come May.
This,
however, depends on whether the results for the fourth quarter of 2016
shows Kenya’s economy grew by at least 5.9 per cent. During the first
three quarters it grew by 5.9, 6.2 and 5.7 percentage points
respectively averaging 5.9 per cent which is within the World Bank’s
projections.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) had
initially predicted a 7.2 per cent growth before revising it to 6.8 per
cent in October while the government had projected growth to be at 6.5
per cent. The Central Bank of Kenya made a 6 per cent growth projection.
This
year, the World Bank has projected East Africa’s largest economy would
grow by 6.0 per cent, a feat Mr Aly Khan Satchu, chief executive of
investment advisory firm Rich Management, says will be hard to achieve.
“History
shows that the Kenyan economy slows down in an election year by about
1.2-1.4 per cent. Typically, folks become cautious and adopt a
wait-and-see attitude but as long as the political rhetoric stays below
the radar, then we should be ok,” he told the Nation.
“However,
what has been noticeable in 2016 and has been measured by the London
School of Economics is that the traditional incumbent re-election bias
is at a historic low and the ground is fast shifting beneath the feet of
the political establishment,” he explains as one of the reasons why
investors will probably hold on to their money in 2017.
The
bitter standoff over whether the General Election will be manually or
electronically conducted is one of the examples Mr Satchu gives on how
politics hurts the economy.
In addition, data shows
that in three out of the five multi-party elections Kenya has held since
1992, the economy either slowed or failed to grow. In 1992 the economy
shrunk by 0.8 per cent and only grew by a paltry 0.5 per cent in 2002.
PREDICT HIGHER GROWTH
During
the run-up to the 2007 election, it grew by an impressive 7 per cent
(the highest in the last 20 years) before tumbling to a measly 0.25 per
cent in 2008 as a result of the post-election violence. In 2013,
economic growth remained at a steady 5.7 per cent although economists
had predicted higher growth.
Mathematically, this shows
there is a 60 per cent chance the economy will slow down this year
given the aftershocks the business environment has been feeling
following the prolonged period of intense political activity.
By
close of business on Friday, investors had lost Sh398 billion at the
Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) following a second consecutive year of
a prolonged bear run at the market characterised by mass selloffs of
shares as most listed companies recorded drops in profit or losses.
During
this period, market capitalisation, which is the aggregate value of all
the listed companies, has shrunk by 14 per cent from Sh2.3 trillion to
Sh1.9 trillion by the close of trading on Friday.
As a result companies have resorted to shrinking their staff or shutting down some of their operations.
East
African Portland Cement, Sameer Africa, Yana Tyres, Airtel, Kenya
Airways, Kenya Flourspar, Eveready East Africa, Karuturi Flowers,
Nestle, Tata and the Nation Media Group are some of the companies that
have either shrunk operations or downsized.
Despite these warning signs Mr Rotich says there is no cause for alarm.
“We
expect growth to remain stable on the back of continued investment
spending in infrastructure and strong consumer spending during
electioneering period. We have made plans to ensure the budget for
2017/18 is approved by March to pave the way for smooth government
operations during July, August and September 2017 which is around the
election date,” he says.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RESERVES
“Other
contingencies in place include the level of official foreign exchange
reserves, which is at an all time high of more than $8.5 billion or 5.5
months of import cover; this will cushion us from exchange rate
pressures should there be any incipient import pressure associated with
election consumption.
We also have a precautionary
facility with the IMF to the tune of $1.5bn should there be a balance of
payment shocks in 2017,” he explains.
But while
narrowing the current account balance may help to keep the local
currency stable, aggressive borrowing by government risks widening the
country’s fiscal deficit, which could expose the economy to systemic
risks. This is because the government is spending a huge chunk of its
money (a good percentage of it borrowed) to repay debts.
Both
the World Bank and the IMF have time and again warned that although
Kenya’s debt is still manageable, the pace at which it is increasing is
worrying.
The debt has increased from 42.1 per cent of
GDP in 2012-13 to 55.1 per cent of GDP in 2015-16, on the back of a
massive increase in development spending.
Transport
Cabinet Secretary James Macharia, whose ministry has taken up most of
the loans, insists the debts are offering value for money.
“The
economic benefits for roads are immediate. When a farmer takes his
milk or maize to the market without worrying about bad roads, that’s an
instant return or when patients reach the hospital in time and better
still if traders move from town to another in time,” he told the Nation.
In
order to spur economic growth in 2017, the government is in the process
of widening its tax base especially in the informal sector to finance
ongoing infrastructural development.
Among its latest initiatives which take effect today (January 1) are sections of the Finance Act 2016.
The
law, which was signed into law in October last year by President Uhuru
Kenyatta, seeks to, among other things, increase the amount of revenue
the government gets from the multi-billion-shilling betting industry
while motivating investment in sectors like housing by making rental
income of less than Sh12,000 exempt from the Rental Income Tax.
No comments:
Post a Comment