By OTIATO GUGUYU, dotiato@ke.nationmedia.com
In Summary
Owners of the collapsed Imperial Bank had several
opportunities to stop a Sh2 billion bond issue before the money, now
locked in for nine months, was deposited with the lender.
The Capital Markets Authority (CMA) says the shareholders had eight chances to stop the bond before it was alloted.
The bond that almost traded on the Nairobi
Securities Exchange (NSE) was stopped last October when the Central Bank
of Kenya (CBK) released a joint statement with CMA stopping its
listing.
“The petitioners being in receipt of material
information impacting the validity or reliability of the public offering
documentation failed, omitted or maliciously declined to inform the
authority and investing public despite their regulatory obligation to do
so, that the bond process should be suspended to prevent losses and
damages to public investors and the credibility of the wider capital
markets,” CMA said in court fillings against a suit by Imperial Bank
owners seeking to stop investigations into the issuance.
CMA said the directors learnt of the fraud on September 21, a day before allotment was made to investors.
The bank even appointed its chairman, Alnashir
Popat, to chair the board audit committee when they learnt of the fraud
but failed to notify CMA of the development.
Ten days before the bond almost traded internal
investigations had encountered frustrations, giving credibility to
suspicion of fraud.
CMA said directors could have stopped the cash on
September 28 when it was credited to the bank or two days later when
they reported results to CMA but instead went ahead with the ruse and
made a public statement on October 2.
The money was deposited into the central depository
accounts of the investors a day before the bank’s board met to discuss
steps to secure the bond on October 7.
CMA argued that the directors do not warrant the
temporary reprieve granted by the court stopping the authority from
investigating them, adding the application was made in bad faith to stop
the inquiry.
The market regulator said the nine shareholders
listed in the suit had been postponing summons to appear before them
since the beginning of the year
No comments:
Post a Comment