Jomo Kenyatta International Airport’s International Arrivals section.
The Greenfield terminal was to handle 20 million passengers or three
times the existing capacity. PHOTO | FILE
By GERALD ANDAE, gandae@ke.nationmedia.com
In Summary
- Minister says the Sh56bn project would yield little value, roots for work on second runway.
- The minister did not, however, indicate what would happen to the contractor and whether there were any plans to compensate them for premature termination of the agreement.
- The Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) recently wrote to the Attorney-General seeking legal opinion on the intended cancellation of the contract by the end of this month.
The plan to construct a new Sh56 billion terminal at
the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) in Nairobi has been
shelved, putting an end to the project which was among the first ones
President Uhuru Kenyatta launched upon coming to power in June 2013.
Transport secretary James Macharia told the Business Daily
that the cancellation of the plan was informed by a recent finding that
the terminal would yield little value for money and that the funds are
better used constructing a second runway.
“We have stopped the Greenfield project because it
has no value for money. We would rather spend that cash building a
second runway as opposed to a new facility,” he said.
The minister did not, however, indicate what would
happen to the contractor and whether there were any plans to compensate
them for premature termination of the agreement.
The Kenya Airports Authority (KAA), the agency that
manages all Kenyan airports, recently wrote to the Attorney-General
seeking legal opinion on the intended cancellation of the contract by
the end of this month, according to documents seen by the Business Daily.
The Greenfield terminal project was to address the
increasing number of passengers passing through Kenya’s main airport and
was to be built by a Chinese firm over a period of 36 months.
The Chinese firm, China National Aero-Technology
International Engineering Corporation (Catic) won the contract to design
and build the facility that was to be financed by a loan from the
African Development Bank (AfDB).
Now that the contractor is required to move out of
site with the cancellation of the plan, the KAA stands the risk of being
made to bear the cost of such demobilisation.
The KAA says in documents seen by the Business
Daily that the contractor had already mobilised 90 per cent of the
equipment required for the execution of the work.
Thirty per cent of detailed designs had been
submitted and reviewed while 60 per cent was on-going at the time the
decision was made to discontinue the project. Excavations for
foundations have been ongoing as well.
Financial documents show that the project was to be
financed 85 per cent by a consortium of local and foreign banks,
including the AfDB, with a 15 per cent counterpart financing from the
Kenya government.
The project has been dogged by a series of
controversies, including the battle over the award of the tender that at
one point implicated former KAA managers in corrupt deals before the
Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) cleared them.
The officials had been accused of failing to comply
with the provisions of the Public Procurement and Disposal Act while
procuring a contractor for the project
No comments:
Post a Comment