It takes guts for an MP to tell his colleagues that some of them
should be sent home permanently and their constituencies rendered
redundant or merged with their neighbours.
It takes a
degree of selflessness to suggest that the National Assembly and county
assemblies have become the greatest guzzlers of scarce national
resources with very little to show for it, and rationalisation is the
only way forward.
A number of courageous legislators have done it.
So have newspaper columnists and pundits.
Now,
the former chairman of the defunct Commission for the Implementation of
the Constitution, Mr Charles Nyachae, has added his voice to the
growing concern, saying that Kenyans are, on the whole, over-represented
and something must done about it.
Indeed, it makes
very little sense for a poor country of 42 million souls to be
represented by 349 legislators, who include 290 elected and 12 nominated
MPs, as well as 47 women representatives.
If each of
these folks is paid at least one million shillings every month in
salaries and perks, and beyond that, most of them earn another million
shillings in committee sitting and travel allowances, it could very well
mean that at a conservative estimate, they people consume Sh1 billion
every month.
And if, as has been revealed, a number
cheat on mileage claims, isn’t it obvious that our representatives at
the constituency level gobble up a substantial percentage of the
country’s revenue every year “without any increase in benefits to the
public” as Mr Nyachae put it?
Here we are not even
talking about 2,526 members of county assemblies, each of whom earns at
least Sh250,000 per month besides numerous perks, per diems and sitting
allowances.
When we talk of a bloated public wage bill
and the need to reduce it, it is interesting that most people think
about civil servants; rarely do they do the math and identify the
bottomless pit into which our tax money goes — into the pockets of our
elected and nominated “people’s servants”.
INELUCTABLE ACTION
A reduction in the number of constituencies should obviously lead to a reduction in the number of counties, which would make a lot of sense, but that would destroy the logic of devolution and would be a hard sell.
A reduction in the number of constituencies should obviously lead to a reduction in the number of counties, which would make a lot of sense, but that would destroy the logic of devolution and would be a hard sell.
In fact, it would lead to the dismantling of the Constitution.
But leaving that aside, we should go back to discussing why a reduction in the number of constituencies is desirable.
To start with, in terms of representation, our MPs have little to do.
Yes, they make laws as per their mandate, and they oversee the constituency development and other funds.
They
also vet appointments to top public jobs and, ideally, should oversight
the operations of the Executive and the full implementation of the
Constitution.
But the general feeling about them these
days is that they exercise a great deal of power without the
responsibility or the moral authority to go with it.
The
moment they watered down vital constitutional provisions on probity
contained in the Leadership and Integrity Act, it led to crooks and
knaves populating the august institution.
Is it any wonder that they are forever fighting all the other arms of government?
They
discovered early that this is the only way they could shield themselves
from public scrutiny, and that impunity actually pays.
EASE THE BURDEN
Long gone are the days when MPs were supposed to launch development projects in their areas.
Long gone are the days when MPs were supposed to launch development projects in their areas.
They no longer have to conduct harambees for building clinics, schools and suchlike.
In
the days of centralised governance, an MP had no choice but to become
“development-conscious”, which in essence meant cosying up to the
President or to the then monolithic ruling party, Kanu.
Woe betide an MP who failed to sing fulsome praises; his or her constituents suffered deliberate neglect.
However,
in these days of devolved governance, governors call all the shots in
their counties. So why should the country need so many MPs?
The
irony of the whole issue is that without their input, even this notion
of reducing the high number of representation in the interests of
ordinary Kenyans may turn out to be a pipe dream.
Thankfully,
such an issue can only be resolved through a referendum which, in my
view, deserves more attention than those issues meant purely to advance
narrow political goals.
As my MP Moses Kuria graphically puts it, “Punda imechoka; punguza mzigo.” Indeed, the donkey is tired.
No comments:
Post a Comment