Solicitor General Njee Muturi (right) consults with Kenya's Ambassador
to the Netherlands Rose Makena and Kenya's UN permanent representative
Macharia Kamau during the opening of the 14th session of the Assembly of
State Parties to the Rome Statute at the Hague. PHOTO | NATION MEDIA
GROUP
Kenya and South Africa’s victory in introducing supplementary
agenda at the Assembly of States Parties appeared short-lived as debate
began in the plenary on Friday.
Billed as a major
confrontation between African states and the International Criminal
Court, the debate exposed divisions between those avoiding to interfere
in the work of the court and those supporting demands to be heard.
All European countries and some in Africa, especially in the West and Botswana, opposed Kenya’s agenda.
The debate was adjourned to today when hopefully, a vote will be taken.
Foreign
Affairs Cabinet Secretary Amina Mohamed delivered a veiled ultimatum to
the ASP: “We expect you to be as clear as we have been … are we adding
value or are we taking up your valuable time?’’. She said an answer
would have to be provided to the African Union by January.
Kenya
is seeking to stop ICC from applying Rule 68 on the use of recanted
evidence in the crimes against humanity case facing Deputy President
William Ruto and journalist Joshua arap Sang at the ICC.
Kenya
also wants the trial suspended until an independent audit into how the
prosecutor obtained witnesses in the case is undertaken.
Fault
lines emerged ahead of the ASP when the ICC president, the prosecutor
and the registrar jointly wrote to the ASP president opposing debate on
how to apply the controversial rule on the use of recanted testimony.
“The
appropriate forum to discuss and contest judicial matters is in the
judicial proceedings before the court,” they said in the letter to ASP
President Sidiki Kaba.
During debate, Ms Mohamed
posed: “Many of us from Africa are feeling unwanted and uncomfortable.
Are we a heavy load that you wish to get rid of?”
Kenya
had drawn support from South Africa, which also presented its own
request for ASP to debate its failure to arrest Sudanese President Omar
el-Bashir this year, which is pending decision by the court.
The
African Union led with statements in support of Kenya’s demand for a
special agenda item. The AU was followed by South Africa, Uganda and
Burundi, which were in turn countered by Botswana and the European
Union.
The Czech Republic and several civil society
organisations also opposed Kenya’s demands. Delegates drew a clear
distinction between the right of states to raise their concerns but
insisted that disputes on the interpretation of the law and rules should
be settled in court.
The European Union, which
represents 33 nations, demanded that any discussion within the Assembly
must respect the competence of the court to interpret the law and the
rules under the Rome Statute.
Civil society
organisations from Kenya and around Africa were quietly lobbying
delegates throughout the week arguing that Kenya and South Africa are
attempting to turn the ASP into an appellate court, and to prematurely
end the Ruto case.
Ms Gladwell Otieno, who spoke on
behalf of Kenyans for Peace with Truth and Justice said: “This Assembly
must speak out clearly in defence of the independence of the court.
Cases being tried by the court must be tried in the courtroom, not in
the corridors of the ASP.”
Ms Mohamed led a strong
delegation including Defence CS Raychelle Omamo, Solicitor-General Njee
Muturi and at least 22 MPs and seven senators, who swarmed the corridors
of the World Forum, venue of the 14th ASP, lobbying delegates and
speaking at side events.
“Our obligations under the
Rome Statute have consumed every other obligation that we have. We
expect that agreements made in good faith will be upheld at all costs.
Nothing, not even the ICC, exists in a vacuum,” said Mohamed.
Although
diplomats seeking to strike a middle ground emphasised the need for
dialogue, many opposed what they termed as interfering in matters before
court.
Ethiopian Foreign Minister Tedros Adhanom
Ghebreyesus, speaking on behalf of the AU, urged ICC to reform or risk
losing its members who are signatories to the Rome Statute.
“We
have arrived at the conclusion that the International Criminal Court
(ICC), whose establishment was strongly supported by Africa... is no
longer a court for all,” Mr Tedros said.
No comments:
Post a Comment