Opinion and Analysis
By GEORGE BODO
This week in our continuing series on banks, I want
to paint a picture of the struggles banks outside Kenya are likely to go
through in the second half of the year.
Just like Kenya, banks in some of middle Africa’s key markets will also have to deal with high balance sheet funding costs.
In Nigeria, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)
directive issued early August — requiring banks to pay for their foreign
exchange (FX) purchases on behalf of clients 48 hours in advance —
together with the operationalisation of the Treasury Single Account
(TSA) system continue to create a roller-coaster in local currency
liquidity levels, hence pricings.
In August, average rates in Nigeria’s overnight
interbank cash market rose to 32 per cent, compared to just 10 per cent
in July (and 17 per cent in the first half of the year).
On the foreign currency front, the staggered
withdrawal of liquidity of a total of $5.8 billion from the banking
system by the country’s state petroleum company, the Nigerian National
Petroleum Company (NNPC) has exacerbated the foreign currency liquidity
problems.
The first withdrawal in June amounted to $2.5
billion and the state oil company is expected to withdraw the balance of
$3.3 billion between August and September.
In Ghana, banks will have to deal with a
continuation of the high cost of deposits because of the crowding out of
private sector by the government.
As a result, banks in Ghana will have to keep
funding themselves at rates above 25 per cent on the local currency
front while on the foreign currency front, rates will continue above 10
per cent. These are very high rates to deal with.
In East Africa, excluding Kenya, tightening policy
responses by central banks in Uganda and Tanzania has created agitation
in liquidity markets.
In Tanzania, average Repo rates in August rose to 10 per cent from six per cent for the first seven months of the year.
In Tanzania, average Repo rates in August rose to 10 per cent from six per cent for the first seven months of the year.
In Uganda, where borrowing rates tend to edge up as
election-related spending dries up liquidity, interbank rates peaked at
20 per cent in August.
The problem in Uganda is rates tend to remain elevated several months after election.
The problem in Uganda is rates tend to remain elevated several months after election.
For instance, in the run-up to the 2011 elections,
which were held in February, both the overnight interbank lending rates
and 91-day Treasury bill yields rose steeply, a trend that persisted and
only peaked in January 2012, almost a year after the elections.
Premium borrowing
Further down south in Zimbabwe and Zambia, it’s the same case.
The two governments are dealing with falling global
commodity prices, which have brought some serious foreign currency
shortages.
So why is cost of funds and liquidity so important?
So why is cost of funds and liquidity so important?
Banks borrow to lend, and in the process pocket the spread between their borrowing and lending costs. Borrowing at premium levels, which has a direct correlation with
liquidity concentration levels in the market, is not good for the length
of the spread.
No comments:
Post a Comment