By Sandra Chao-Blasto
In Summary
- The Eastleigh Shopping Mall and its eight directors have taken the taxman to court seeking a reversal of orders freezing their bank accounts and seizure of their assets over a Sh386 million demand by the agency.
- Court documents show that between May and July 2014 KRA conducted a tax audit on the mall covering value added tax, PAYE and withholding tax.
- Based on the report the shopping mall said it entered into a payment plan with the taxman to settle the outstanding taxes in August 2014 and since then has not defaulted on the agreed payment schedule.
The Eastleigh Shopping Mall and its eight directors
have taken the taxman to court seeking a reversal of orders freezing
their bank accounts and seizure of their assets over a Sh386 million
demand by the agency.
The mall and its owners have filed a constitutional petition
seeking to reverse court orders issued in two separate cases allowing
the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) to seize their property and freeze six
bank accounts registered to the mall and 12 belonging to its directors.
“The search and seizure of the petitioners’
property and freezing of their bank accounts comes at a curious time
when there is continued harassment of businesspeople with ethnicity and
heritage similar to the petitioners by most organs of the State,” claims
the petitioners.
Court documents show that between May and July 2014
KRA conducted a tax audit on the mall covering value added tax, PAYE
and withholding tax.
The taxman wrote to the mall and its directors
demanding Sh386 million for the period between 2008 and 2013 and gave
them a month to object to any of the assessments.
Based on the report the shopping mall said it entered into a payment plan with the taxman to settle the outstanding taxes in August 2014 and since then has not defaulted on the agreed payment schedule.
Based on the report the shopping mall said it entered into a payment plan with the taxman to settle the outstanding taxes in August 2014 and since then has not defaulted on the agreed payment schedule.
KRA filed the criminal suit against the mall on
April 13 and got orders allowing it to seize from the premises
import-export documents, books of accounts and money, data storage
devices including CCTV cameras and other records that would enable them
carry out a tax investigation between 2007 and 2015.
The revenue collector claimed in the case that
while the mall files income tax and VAT returns regularly, the
comparison of the declared turnover showed variances in each year adding
that while the mall was a commercial building it did not file any
rental income.
“On July 3, the respondents in a fresh criminal
application obtained ex-parte orders freezing the petitioners’ accounts
in various banks,” says the court papers.
The mall owners argue that on July 10 the taxman
had notified the public of proposals contained in the Finance Bill 2015,
including a 100 per cent tax amnesty for individual landlords on
principal taxes, penalties and interest for periods before 2013 and
further amnesty on penalties and interest for years 2014 and 2015.
“If any tax liability is established we would be
entitled to benefit from the general amnesty contained in sections 1 and
15 of the Finance Bill 2015,” they said. The matter will be mentioned
Friday before Justice Mumbi Ngugi.
tax claim
By Sandra Chao-Blasto
In Summary
- The Eastleigh Shopping Mall and its eight directors have taken the taxman to court seeking a reversal of orders freezing their bank accounts and seizure of their assets over a Sh386 million demand by the agency.
- Court documents show that between May and July 2014 KRA conducted a tax audit on the mall covering value added tax, PAYE and withholding tax.
- Based on the report the shopping mall said it entered into a payment plan with the taxman to settle the outstanding taxes in August 2014 and since then has not defaulted on the agreed payment schedule.
The Eastleigh Shopping Mall and its eight directors
have taken the taxman to court seeking a reversal of orders freezing
their bank accounts and seizure of their assets over a Sh386 million
demand by the agency.
The mall and its owners have filed a constitutional petition
seeking to reverse court orders issued in two separate cases allowing
the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) to seize their property and freeze six
bank accounts registered to the mall and 12 belonging to its directors.
“The search and seizure of the petitioners’
property and freezing of their bank accounts comes at a curious time
when there is continued harassment of businesspeople with ethnicity and
heritage similar to the petitioners by most organs of the State,” claims
the petitioners.
Court documents show that between May and July 2014
KRA conducted a tax audit on the mall covering value added tax, PAYE
and withholding tax.
The taxman wrote to the mall and its directors
demanding Sh386 million for the period between 2008 and 2013 and gave
them a month to object to any of the assessments.
Based on the report the shopping mall said it entered into a payment plan with the taxman to settle the outstanding taxes in August 2014 and since then has not defaulted on the agreed payment schedule.
Based on the report the shopping mall said it entered into a payment plan with the taxman to settle the outstanding taxes in August 2014 and since then has not defaulted on the agreed payment schedule.
KRA filed the criminal suit against the mall on
April 13 and got orders allowing it to seize from the premises
import-export documents, books of accounts and money, data storage
devices including CCTV cameras and other records that would enable them
carry out a tax investigation between 2007 and 2015.
The revenue collector claimed in the case that
while the mall files income tax and VAT returns regularly, the
comparison of the declared turnover showed variances in each year adding
that while the mall was a commercial building it did not file any
rental income.
“On July 3, the respondents in a fresh criminal
application obtained ex-parte orders freezing the petitioners’ accounts
in various banks,” says the court papers.
The mall owners argue that on July 10 the taxman
had notified the public of proposals contained in the Finance Bill 2015,
including a 100 per cent tax amnesty for individual landlords on
principal taxes, penalties and interest for periods before 2013 and
further amnesty on penalties and interest for years 2014 and 2015.
“If any tax liability is established we would be
entitled to benefit from the general amnesty contained in sections 1 and
15 of the Finance Bill 2015,” they said. The matter will be mentioned
Friday before Justice Mumbi Ngugi.
No comments:
Post a Comment