Politics and policy
Suspended Lands Cabinet Secretary Charity Ngilu. PHOTO | FILE |
NATION MEDIA GROUP
By BDAfrica.com REPORTER
Public prosecutors will face off against suspended
lands minister Charity Ngilu over her role in protecting key players in
the Sh8 billion Karen land scandal.
A statement from the office of the
Director of Public Prosecutions agreed with a recommendation from the
Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) that the minister face
charges for hindering investigations into the matter.
The anti-graft body was looking
into allegations that top State officials were beneficiaries of a
‘public’ land parcel in Nairobi’s Karen suburb. It turned out the parcel
was private land that had mysteriously been double allocated to lawyer
Horatius Da Gama Rose of Muchanga Investment Ltd and Jos Konzolo of
Telesource.com Ltd before the invasion by other parties.
“(Ngilu) is alleged to have
obstructed the collection of evidence… by directing Lands ministry
officers not to release documents or record statements with EACC
investigators,” Tobiko said in a statement released Wednesday. “Having
reviewed the evidence, I am satisfied the charge is sustainable.”
EACC had not recommended any charges against the Lands CS in relation to the fraudulent transactions themselves.
Instead, they suggested charging a
number of ministry officials, including the Chief Lands Registrar, the
Deputy Chief Lands Registrar, the Senior Deputy Director of Survey and
the Registrar of Titles. Also to be charged is a director of Telesource.
The DPP also directed prosecution
ensue against Ganze MP Peter Safari Shehe and five others accused of
misappropriating an undisclosed amount from the Constituency Development
Fund account.
He also called for further
investigations into whether the Trans Nzoia county government was
involved in procurement fraud in relation to the purchase of Vipul House
for Sh500 million.
EACC had said their probe
unearthed no evidence of a crime and recommended closing the file but
Tobiko says an independent review showed there was some evidence of
procurement-related offences.
No comments:
Post a Comment