In Summary
- The British high commissioner accused of coordinating meetings in Dar es Salaam and Dodoma against proper procedures
Dodoma. The government has
accused the UK High Commissioner to Tanzania, Ms Dianna Melrose, of
influencing other development partners to cut aid and support to
Tanzania. The deputy minister for Energy and Minerals, Mr Steven
Maselle, told Parliament yesterday that the envoy was violating
diplomatic principles.
He said the envoy was coordinating meetings in Dar
es Salaam and Dodoma against proper and accepted procedures to convince
other development partners to stop supporting Tanzania.
The deputy minister added that she was pushing
the government to take a loan from Standard Chartered Bank to pay
private companies.
“Tanzania is a sovereign state; we have our way of doing things and no-one should intervene our programmes,” he said.
Earlier this month Ms Melrose told The Citizen
that the UK and other development partners are concerned about the
controversy surrounding the acquisition of Independent Power Tanzania
Limited (IPTL).
She said the IPTL issue was of “great concern” to
the British government, adding that the High Commission had already
communicated with the relevant ministers in addition to writing to the
BoT Governor.
Earlier, opposition MPs yesterday walked out of
the debating chamber, protesting the manner in which the debate on the
2014/2015 Energy and Minerals budget estimates was being conducted.
The walk-out was curtain-raised by remarks by Mr
Freeman Mbowe, leader of the Opposition, that, it was pointless for the
camp’s members to continue participating in a session that sought to
hide corruption- related issues.
At a media briefing session, he claimed that CCM
had crafted a stand under which its legislators were bound to endorse
the ministry’s budget proposals, and defend the government against
corruption scandals.
Mr Mbowe said the opposition MPs had opted to
walk out after learning that their CCM counterparts had vowed to
endorse the budget without taking their camp’s arguments into account.
He described the IPTL scandal as an issue of critical public interest
that needed to be debated thoroughly in the House but which CCM
legislators weren’t ready to see happening.
According to him, many MPs had submitted evidence to the Speaker but it was obvious no good would come out of the initiative.
“We have evidence including the report that was
prepared and presented to the government officials by experts on IPTL.
They advised what the government could do to face the challenge but
nothing has been done so far, ” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment