By Scott Bellows
In Summary
- Over-organised situations lead to lower organisational performance by decreasing employee motivation, stifling innovation, and lowering output through time wastage.
- Like over-organised situations, the under-organised lead to lower staff motivation, chaos, and ineffective time wastage that lowers profits.
Chebet braved her morning commute to arrive at
her parastatal on the outskirts of the Nairobi Central Business
District. She arrived energetic and ready to face her day.
However, by 10am, she needed to print a document
in preparation for a later afternoon meeting. While printing, her
department-allocated paper ran out. She then inquired from colleagues
about where to obtain more printing paper.
The answers Ms Chebet received ranged from comical
to insane. First, she needed to draft a two-page requisition
justifying why she needed more paper. Since she had no paper, a
colleague printed her typed up justification. Then, Ms Chebet obtained
her immediate supervisors approval on the requisition.
The request proceeded to the departmental manager
who proposed several changes. After making the changes, Ms Chebet then
resubmitted it to her supervisor for re-approval and then to the
manager. Her requisition then reached the finance team then to
purchasing then to logistics officers.
Ms Chebet missed her meeting. She got the papers two weeks later. Furious Chebet posted her CV online to look for another job.
Do you ever burn with frustration from intense
operational constraints in your office? Do you sometimes feel that even
obtaining a property mortgage is actually easier than pushing through
simple processes at your firm? How much time do you waste each day on
bureaucracy? Have you ever switched jobs over frustration from field
constraints?
Today Business Talk embarks on a new
series showcasing organisational development. A simple definition of
organisational development involves enabling entities to solve problems
and achieve goals.
The discipline achieves objectives through
expanding the knowledge and effectiveness of people and affecting
organisational change.
Clearly, the parastatal where Ms Chebet worked
urgently needs organisational development to institute change. An
organisational behaviour expert would come in and assess the degree of
organisation within the firm. The degree of organisation entails the
extent of entity policies and procedures existent in the institution.
Research shows that organisations pass through
three phases on their way to large dominant status. First, a firm or NGO
begins as a grassroots effort. Perhaps a group of women in a village
outside Karatina desires come together and find a solution for lack of
clean water. They pool resources and bring water onto their farms.
Later, the women expand and supply water to
neighbouring villages. They develop processes and procedures from
everything including client acquisition to collection of water usage
fees. The women also begin to hire professionals to run the business
instead of their initial community committee.
Finally, the water company might serve an entire
county. The large scale hints that the organisation now operates in the
institutional phase of growth.
How might you identify whether your firm operates
in an over-organised environment? Look for signs of highly mechanistic
processes. To perform tasks, must you follow a procedure that seems to
go against natural organic flows? If so, your firm prefers mechanistic
approaches.
Next, like in Ms Chebet’s example, does your
firm’s bureaucracy defy logic and create too many levels of approval
that hinder you accomplishing tasks quickly and efficiently?
As a way to prevent corruption, theft, or simply
as a way to control employees, firms often implement rigid and overly
defined structures, leadership styles, job designs, and policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment