Money Markets
By GALGALO FAYO
In Summary
- Eric Mutua says the deal between the government and the Malili Ranch Ltd, which he acted for, was approved by the Office of the Attorney-General and maintained the transaction was above board.
- Mr Mutua refuted CID claims that he was unable to account for Sh14.5 million in his account, arguing the cash is client money.
- Mr Mutua claimed police are being used to silence him through the charges.
Law Society of Kenya chairman Eric Mutua has
claimed the release of a letter implicating him in the alleged Malili
scandal is meant to derail LSK’s plan to challenge the multi-billion
standard gauge rail deal in court.
Mr Mutua says the deal between the government and
the Malili Ranch Ltd, which he acted for, was approved by the Office of
the Attorney-General and maintained the transaction was above board.
Last week it emerged that Directorate of Criminal
Investigation (DCI) had written to the Director of Public Prosecutions
seeking prosecution of Machakos Senator Johnstone Muthama, former
Information PS Bitange Ndemo and Mr Mutua over a 5,000-acre piece of
land transaction that cost the taxpayer Sh1 billion.
“It (recommendation) has mischief in the way it
was released. As LSK we are considering to file the suit this week to
stop standard gauge railway. Maybe it was meant to derail our plan,”
said Mr Mutua at a press conference at the LSK offices on Tuesday.
The DCI said there was a conspiracy to defraud
more than 6,000 shareholders of the Malili ranch in a deal where the
Government bought the land for Konza Technopolis allegedly without
conducting due diligence.
Also recommended for prosecution are former
Commissioner of Lands Zablon Mabea, James Waweru, who was at the AG’s
office, and three directors of the company.
Mr Muthama is accused of conspiring with Mr Mutua
to process fake minutes of an AGM in which the resolutions to sell the
land were reached.
Three of the seven directors of the company Julius
Kilonzo, Peter Kanyi and Josiah Manuki are to face charges of being
core players in the alleged conspiracy and benefiting from the proceeds
of the sale according to the letter.
Mr Mutua refuted CID claims that he was unable to account for Sh14.5 million in his account, arguing the cash is client money.
He further produced a court ruling delivered in
2011, in which two directors who are being recommended for fresh
prosecution — Mr Kilonzo and Kanyi — were acquitted of alleged criminal
offence in the transaction.
In the ruling, the court observed that the
“precious judicial time had been wasted on the hearing of trumped up
charges against the accused persons to satisfy the whims of some persons
superior to the investigating officer”.
The LSK chair testified in the case as a witness.
Mr Mutua claimed police are being used to silence
him through the charges. He produced an affidavit allegedly sworn by
Malili treasurer Leonard Kitua, who claims that a CID officer forced him
and other company directors to change their earlier statement to
implicate him and Mr Muthama.
Mr Kitua, in the affidavit, says that together
with other directors of the ranch they accepted to change the statement
to disown some minutes and board resolution relating to transaction.
Meanwhile, Mr Mutua, on behalf of LSK, says if the
government paid Sh125 billion to two Anglo Leasing companies, they
would initiate private prosecution against individuals who committed the
country to such payments.
No comments:
Post a Comment