By MARVIN SISSEY
In Summary
- A little patience in the face of strong temptation can reinforce the value of something.
I sat patiently in the seemingly endless traffic gridlock. Actually, patient may not be the right word to use in this context.
Resigned is more like it because I really didn’t
have a choice; at least not a legal one. I silently cursed as I watched
some fellow drivers worsen the situation by overlapping.
Why were they so impatient? But this is no longer a
puzzle. It turns out that your average overlapping driver is not so
intelligent (it’s not a stereotype). They are also unlikely to be very
successful (admittedly a very subjective inference).
Apparently one’s propensity to be overly impatient
and hence seek instant gratification is not just a pointer to immature
character and personality; it is highly correlated to your below par
innate intelligence.
This is not one of those wild claims like the
overblown yet unsubstantiated health and economic benefits of quails and
their eggs. This theory is backed by some healthy dose of scientific
research coming from no less an institution than Stanford University.
Ironically, the name of the experiment may not
portray the seriousness and the great impact that the studies have had
in the field of psychology and personality theory.
Branded the Stanford Marshmallow Experiment, it
sounds more like some confectionery recipe rather than a serious
scientific breakthrough. You remember marshmallows?
Those cylindrical confectioneries that consist of
sugar, corn syrup and gelatine whipped to a spongy consistency and
coated with maize starch.
Enter Walter Mischel —the Austrian born turned
American citizen who in the late 1960s was a professor of psychology at
Stanford University.
Mischel is now an accomplished clinical
psychologist with feathers in his cap including being the past editor of
the highly rated Psychological Review as well as past president of the
American Psychological Association Division of Social and Personality
Psychology.
Walter Mischel pioneered the first official
recorded seminal scientific research into delayed gratification and
ability to exert self-control in the face of strong situational
pressures and emotionally “hot” temptations.
In what has come to be referred to as the
Marshmallow experiment, Mischel aimed to ascertain whether one’s
propensity to delay gratification is inbred from an early age and, as
shown in the follow up experiments, whether it could be a predictive
indicator of one’s future behaviour.
Using children between the ages of four to six, Mischel would put one child in a room without any distractions.
He would then put one marshmallow on a plate on
the table and tell the child that they had two options: either they
would ring a bell (placed in the room) at any point to summon the
experimenter upon which they would only eat that single marshmallow, or
that they could wait until the experimenter returned after a few minutes
(typically around 15 minutes) and earn an extra marshmallow.
Eating the marshmallow in advance was thus an
express forfeiture for the extra marshmallow. The message was: “small
reward now, bigger reward later.”
No comments:
Post a Comment